Most Read Articles Today
The Real Aim of Israel’s Bomb Iran Campaign
Written by Web Master Monday, 02 August 2010 07:20
Reuel Marc Gerecht’s screed justifying an Israeli bombing attack on Iran coincides with the opening of the new Israel lobby campaign marked by the introduction of House Resolution 1553 expressing full support for such an Israeli attack.
What is important to understand about this campaign is that the aim of Gerecht and of the right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu is to support an attack by Israel so that the United States can be drawn into direct, full-scale war with Iran.
That has long been the Israeli strategy for Iran, because Israel cannot fight a war with Iran without full U.S. involvement. Israel needs to know that the United States will finish the war that Israel wants to start.
Gerecht openly expresses the hope that any Iranian response to the Israeli attack would trigger full-scale U.S. war against Iran. "If Khamenei has a death-wish, he’ll let the Revolutionary Guards mine the strait, the entrance to the Persian Gulf," writes Gerecht. "It might be the only thing that would push President Obama to strike Iran militarily…." Gerecht suggest that the same logic would apply to any Iranian "terrorism against the United States after an Israeli strike," by which we really means any attack on a U.S. target in the Middle East. Gerecht writes that Obama might be "obliged" to threaten major retaliation "immediately after an Israeli surprise attack."
That’s the key sentence in this very long Gerecht argument. Obama is not going to be "obliged" to join Israeli aggression against Iran unless he feels that domestic political pressures to do so are too strong to resist. That’s why the Israelis are determined to line up a strong majority in Congress and public opinion for war to foreclose Obama’s options.
In the absence of confidence that Obama would be ready to come into the war fully behind Israel, there cannot be an Israeli strike.
Gerecht’s argument for war relies on a fanciful nightmare scenario of Iran doling out nuclear weapons to Islamic extremists all over the Middle East. But the real concern of the Israelis and their lobbyists, as Gerecht’s past writing has explicitly stated, is to destroy Iran’s Islamic regime in a paroxysm of U.S. military violence.
Gerecht first revealed this Israeli-neocon fantasy as early as 2000, before the Iranian nuclear program was even taken seriously, in an essay written for a book published by the Project for a New American Century. Gerecht argued that, if Iran could be caught in a "terrorist act," the U.S. Navy should "retaliate with fury." The purpose of such a military response, he wrote, should be to "strike with truly devastating effect against the ruling mullahs and the repressive institutions that maintain them."
And lest anyone fail to understand what he meant by that, Gerecht was more explicit: "That is, no cruise missiles at midnight to minimize the body count. The clerics will almost certainly strike back unless Washington uses overwhelming, paralyzing force."
In 2006-07, the Israeli war party had reason to believed that it could hijack U.S. policy long enough to get the war it wanted, because it had placed one of its most militant agents, David Wurmser, in a strategic position to influence that policy.
We now know that Wurmser, formerly a close adviser to Benjamin Netanyahu and during that period Vice President Dick Cheney’s main adviser on the Middle East, urged a policy of overwhelming U.S. military force against Iran. After leaving the administration in 2007, Wurmser revealed that he had advocated a U.S. war on Iran, not to set back the nuclear program but to achieve regime change.
"Only if what we do is placed in the framework of a fundamental assault on the survival of the regime will it have a pick-up among ordinary Iranians," Wurmser told The Telegraph. The U.S. attack was not to be limited to nuclear targets but was to be quite thorough and massively destructive. "If we start shooting, we must be prepared to fire the last shot. Don’t shoot a bear if you’re not going to kill it."
Of course, that kind of war could not be launched out of the blue. It would have required a casus belli to justify a limited initial attack that would then allow a rapid escalation of U.S. military force. In 2007, Cheney acted on Wurmser’s advice and tried to get Bush to provoke a war with Iran over Iraq, but it was foiled by the Pentagon.
As Wurmser was beginning to whisper that advice in Cheney’s ear in 2006, Gerecht was making the same argument in the Weekly Standard:
"Bombing the nuclear facilities once would mean we were declaring war on the clerical regime. We shouldn’t have any illusions about that. We could not stand idly by and watch the mullahs build other sites. If the ruling mullahs were to go forward with rebuilding what they’d lost–and it would be surprising to discover the clerical regime knuckling after an initial bombing run–we’d have to strike until they stopped. And if we had any doubt about where their new facilities were (and it’s a good bet the clerical regime would try to bury new sites deep under heavily populated areas), and we were reasonably suspicious they were building again, we’d have to consider, at a minimum, using special-operations forces to penetrate suspected sites."
The idea of waging a U.S. war of destruction against Iran is obvious lunacy, which is why U.S. military leaders have strongly resisted it both during the Bush and Obama administrations. But Gerecht makes it clear that Israel believes it can use its control of Congress to pound Obama into submission. Democrats in Congress, he boasts, "are mentally in a different galaxy than they were under President Bush." Even though Israel has increasingly been regarded around the world as a rogue state after its Gaza atrocities and the commando killings of unarmed civilians on board the Mavi Marmara, its grip on the U.S. Congress appears as strong as ever.
Moreover, polling data for 2010 show that a majority of Americans have already been manipulated into supporting war against Iran – in large part because more than two-thirds of those polled have gotten the impression that Iran already has nuclear weapons. The Israelis are apparently hoping to exploit that advantage. "If the Israelis bomb now, American public opinion will probably be with them," writes Gerecht. "Perhaps decisively so." Netanyahu must be feeling good about the prospects for pressuring Barack Obama to join an Israeli war of aggression against Iran. It was Netanyahu, after all, who declared in 2001, "I know what America is. America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction. They won’t get in the way."
To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.
Preview :
Today's Exclusive
US-EU and Their All-OUT Colonial Wars 22/07/2010 | kazi mahmood Has Europe and the USA really moved on from the age old 'colonial' endeavors that fashioned their cultures and thinking and built their economies in the past? |
Germany could win the Heart of all Fans 04/07/2010 | kazi mahmood Brazil out, Argentina falls, Paraguay and Ghana sees the exit door. The World Cup remained firmly in the grip of the European teams with three European nations in the Semi-Finals and only Uruguay (t [ ... ] | Other Articles
|
News Categories
Oil and Gas Conference
Editorial
Young Writer
Widescreen ...Garmin
Best Price $178.00
or Buy New $178.00
Privacy Information
Banner Advertisement
Who's Online
Global News
Witsa
IceCarousel
CIA bomber video calls for attacks against U.S.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F-VO1MAoX0
A video has been released showing a suicide bomber who attacked a US base in Afghanistan and killed seven people, including six CIA officers.
Video: Afghans Champion of resistance v/s occupation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r54SnuOXrY
President Obama has committed 17,000 more troops to Afghanistan. This decision raises serious questions about troops, costs, overall mission, and exit strategy.
The Peace Walk Across The World: Roland Höhn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhLt6HR54cs
oland'O parcourt le monde depuis 2003, sans moyens, à la récolte de 1.5 milliards de signatures pour la paix dans le monde. La titanesque mission qu'il poursuit a pour but de remettre en décembre 2012 aux Nations Unies à Genève la volonté écrite et signée de la totalité des votants de la planète pour un véritable monde de paix.
Video: Brzezinski on the Afghan war
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfikRg2jE6o&feature=player_embedded#
Interview of an American imperialist on Afghanistan. Good to know what they really think and when listening to them, we understand a bit of their misconceptions in life.
Journalist: US Team To Secure Pak Nukes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EDaSbMkrfY
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh says the US has a rapid response unit ready to secure Pakistan's nuclear weapons in the event of a mutiny or "any nuclear incident", a claim the US and Pakistani governments have denied.
Video: The World Aint Forget Gaza January 09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO3f4u5TnJ0&feature=player_embedded#
A powerful video that tells why the entire world (at least the world that is compassionate and tolerant) will not forget the Zionist crimes during the Israeli invasion of Gaza in Dec-Jan 09.
CIA Overthrow of Mossadeq, Iran Premier 1953
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaGCJmCAJ40
The CIA is a terrorist organization, violating international laws to change governments - legitimately elected governments - and creating chaos in many other parts of the world.
video: Taliban attacks Nato tankers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kODMmzlQyfg
Taliban Attack on NATO Supplies in Peshawar, Pakistan - A lengthy video but detailed, showing Taliban forces attacking Nato tankers and lorries.
The European Attempt At Ending Gaza Siege
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJfIo_8msDE&feature=player_embedded
Attention: This video contains graphic contents; viewer discretion is advised
Video: Taliban attack on U.S. airfield
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxTIh-XLIaw
BREAKING NEWS Early Morning Today Taliban Attack Bagram Airfield US Base Suicide Attack Kabul US First Responders Help out. Package of an attack at Bagram Airfield which left ten Taliban militants dead and nine U.S. service members wounded. Produced by Senior Airman Jay Hernandez. Soundbites from Col. Christian Benjamin. Video courtesy DOD
Genies in a bottle
Eyes in Sky - This video will really scare you
Though we do not really know who took the videos and where it originates, we have the information that it was taken after the Indonesian earthquake in Padang, Riau. If you look patiently at the video, you will see a pair of eyes that is formed in the clouds overlooking a village in Indonesia. It will really shock and scare you!
However, apparently this video was taken a few years ago in Russia. Hence the source is unknown and the location too but it is a very real video, not a graphic picture.
A 'crawling Jin' in the street?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBQjfCo3kL4
Is this a Jin crawling in the street in Palestine? The author who posted the video on Youtube has this to say: "This video came from first source of busines's security camera in Rahat - palstine.