Why Aljazeera screen OBL audio, not Taliban video's?

There has been many questions on the credibility of the Al-Jazeera TV station network from Qatar. Now one more question arise: Why does the Al-Jazeera screen Osama Bin Laden purported and doubtful audio tapes but fails to show its audience Taliban videos? Is it afraid of backlash from the American authorities or is it simply one more propaganda engine in the vast zionist, American propaganda machinery?

The audio tape said to be from Osama Bin Laden, the fugitive Islamic leader accused (without proof) of terrorism, is always given prime time on Al-Jazeera. The station's journalists present the piece of crap as if it is 'international' news value but when you question them on the origin of the tape and on whether they definitely know it is from OBL, they tell you a different story.
The Taliban has produced many exclusive video's that can hardly be termed 'doubtful' or of 'unknown' origin. In these videos - many of them published on Wfol.tv - the Taliban shows its prowess and its capacity to destroy the American-NATO tanks, attack their fuel supply lines and even carry out attacks against Nato bases across Afghanistan. The Al-Jazeera network is shy and silent on these videos, depriving its millions of viewers of the truth and of real time actual videos showing how Muslims can aggressively defeat the enemy forces that invaded Afghanistan. Compared to the sloppy and doubtful 'audio' tapes said to be from OBL, these videos are prime time news and would give more credit to Al-Jazeera. However, the network prefers to support tapes that we suspect are from some 'intel' sources that has an agenda, that of discrediting Islam and bringing blame on Osama.
Hence, is it possible that Al-Jazeera is effectively a pro-U.S. network that supports the war against the Taliban and supports the occupation of Afghanistan? There is barely a report on Al-Jazeera that shows the capacity of the Taliban to wack the stupid dog from U.S.A. but there's ample evidence of pro-American type of reportage - including screening of fake audio tapes said to be from Osama - in order to support the American war against terrorism which is by the way a war against Islam!
Why is that the case? Is it because Al-Jazeera is not capable of telling the other, true side of the story in Afghanistan? What stops them from doing so? Almost all reports regarding Afghanistan is anti-Taliban in nature thus perpetuating the apparent conspiracy of world wide networks against the Muslim Mujahideen forces in the world.
In other cases, Al-Jazeera was seen making a big fuss of an Indian woman who converted to Islam but who wanted to revert back to Hinduism and was arrested by the Malaysian authorities. Showing that the network was defending the freedom of the individual to choose her religion, the Al-Jazeera reporter even criticized the Malaysian 'Ulema' for allowing such an arrest to take place. This kind of bravery is not seen when it comes to Somalia, Yemen or Iraq and even Afghanistan. On the Iraq issue, one well known Al-Jazeera presenter was very free to call the anti-American forces in Iraq 'terrorists' and called for their 'elimination' by the American forces thus supporting the American illegal invasion of Iraq.
The bigger question is whether this network is actually anti-Islam or is pro-Zionist in the end? I am just wondering. Is it that hard for a Muslim network to really portray the true picture of things and not to have the ball bearings caught in the American grinder? That is why at World Futures Online we set the example. We are pro-Islam and we call ourself 'Islamic Political Portal' something which even Al-Jazeera is shy to do!

---

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites